AETEC logo
AETEC Adaptive Manufacturing Digital Twin
SYNTHETIC DATA
COMMON FOUNDATION

Scan and qualify the free-state part

Establish reliable datums, a full-field as-built surface and a confidence map before any robot path is released.

G3 DIGITAL THREAD HOLD
PART C-017 · CURVED PANEL
VIEW SCANNED FREE STATE
Nominal Actual Approved path
Free-state peak warp 5.0 mm Part-specific scan
Predicted fit error 0.62 mm Includes model + process
Measurement confidence 88 % Occlusion-limited
Qualified coverage 94 % Rescan 2 regions
CALIBRATED PROCESS MODEL

Process response laboratory

Tune the active process on coupons, then test the model on representative geometry and held-out parts.

SURFACE MAP

Confidence map

LOWHIGH
CROSS-SECTION

Prediction envelope

mm
RELEASE LOGIC

Automatic refusal rules

PRODUCTION ARCHITECTURE STUDY

One software platform. The right physical separation.

Compare a single enclosure, modular dry/clean zones and fully separate specialist cells using the POC evidence.

POC BASELINEMODULAR COMMON PLATFORM
DRY / EXTRACTED ZONE Scan · Trim · Machine · Sand

Composite-dust extraction, tool exchange and protected metrology.

Datum-controlled transferClean + verify
CLEAN COATING ZONE Spray · Flash · Cure · Verify

2K preparation, booth controls and contamination release.

ASSEMBLY / FIT ZONE Constrain · Gap scan · Shim

Representative final boundary and installation-force evidence.

Decision rule

“One cell” may mean one coordinated digital line—not every process inside the same physical enclosure. The POC measures cleaning, changeover, contamination, utilisation and recovery time before the production layout is frozen.

BLIND-VALIDATED FEASIBILITY

Prove predictability—not one successful demonstration.

Characterise multiple demoulded parts, build the free-to-constrained model, then verify on held-out parts.

STUDY READINESS INDICATIVE
SAMPLE POPULATION

Validation design

G0–G6

Evidence gates

CUSTOMER INPUTS

Required before release

G0–G1Freeze inputsParts · datums · truth · safety
G2–G3Build evidence modelMetrology · free → constrained
G4–G5Coupon + process trialsDry run · recipes · refusal
G6Blind demonstrationFit · limits · architecture
SIMULATOR GUIDE

What this digital twin proves

01
Separate shape from fit

A large free-state warp can be acceptable only if the transformation to the final constrained assembly is predictable.

02
Map final intent back to the free part

Required edges and features are inverse-mapped into the scanned shape before generating a bounded toolpath.

03
Verify on blind parts

Parts withheld from model development determine whether the method generalises beyond a tuned sample.

04
Refuse unsafe or weak evidence

Low scan confidence, model extrapolation, expired mixed coating or contamination risk must create Hold, Rescan or Stop states.